Ultimate Amiga

Ultimate Amiga Emulation => Installation & Running Help => PSPUAE => Bug Reports & Feedback => Topic started by: DC on October 20, 2007, 03:45:39 PM

Title: 3.40 oe-a vs. 3.52 m33 -4 (PSP-UAE directory speed)
Post by: DC on October 20, 2007, 03:45:39 PM
I noticed it takes a little bit longer to load directories (DISKS) now using 3.52 m33 -4 versus 3.40 oe-a.
Is it my imagination or has anyone else noticed this?

It's not major, just about an extra second or so...I got pretty used to the speed before - I just upgraded yesterday.
 

This may be nit-picking but I just wnated to be sure it wasnt my imagination.
Title: Re: 3.40 oe-a vs. 3.52 m33 -4 (PSP-UAE directory speed)
Post by: FOL on October 20, 2007, 08:14:40 PM
Quote from: DC on October 20, 2007, 03:45:39 PM
I noticed it takes a little bit longer to load directories (DISKS) now using 3.52 m33 -4 versus 3.40 oe-a.
Is it my imagination or has anyone else noticed this?

It's not major, just about an extra second or so...I got pretty used to the speed before - I just upgraded yesterday.
 

This may be nit-picking but I just wnated to be sure it wasnt my imagination.

You would be correct, i to noticed this. But I find 3.71 Kernel seems to feel faster over all. As you said though its not major.
Title: Re: 3.40 oe-a vs. 3.52 m33 -4 (PSP-UAE directory speed)
Post by: The Evolution Of Life on October 21, 2007, 10:17:59 AM
I find 3.71M33-2 the best.
Title: Re: 3.40 oe-a vs. 3.52 m33 -4 (PSP-UAE directory speed)
Post by: FOL on October 21, 2007, 10:33:46 AM
Quote from: The Evolution Of Life on October 21, 2007, 10:17:59 AM
I find 3.71M33-2 the best.

Seems to be, maybe the fact they moved alot of stuff around and started using the other flashes. It definately feels faster on loading etc etc.

Also, i have over 100 files in the state dir, and i didnt get second pause with 3.71 M33-2. Maybe i was thinking back to when i had 3.52 M33-4.
Title: Re: 3.40 oe-a vs. 3.52 m33 -4 (PSP-UAE directory speed)
Post by: Hungry Horace on October 21, 2007, 11:35:25 AM
i noticed the DISKS/ ffolder taking a long time recently, but i had assumed that was because i'd filled it with ZIPS rather than normal ADFS