Ultimate Amiga

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: SNES vs. GBA  (Read 10234 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

EmuChicken

  • PSPUAE Beta Tester
  • A500
  • *****
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 418
SNES vs. GBA
« on: September 18, 2007, 08:39:03 AM »

lol, just checking your site now... interesting...  I used to have that star trek machine!  :D  - was pretty good ;)

..  I'm a bit unsure on the rating system between how "powerful" the Psp is compared to the DS... sure the psp has 333 (when OVERCLOCKED- standard 266 I think) - then the DS has a 66mhz.....  seems crappy, but I'm pretty sure theres 2 chips in there ... somewhere ;)

also the gba is nowhere near as powerful as the snes, the reason why it seems that way is cos the screens so bloody small....  no chance you can even try to compare some games (mario kart, f-zero etc)....  but hey, its a bloody good machine! :> ...  I'd say its kinda like a "watered down" snes you can fit in yer pocket... the same way a gameboy is a watered down NES ;-)
Logged

Trekster

  • A600
  • *
  • Karma: -2
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 20
  • tis a far far better thing I do....
    • Digital Dreams Classic Gaming
SNES vs. GBA
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2007, 07:02:07 PM »

The PSP standard is 333MZH thats its true clock speed, it is not overclocked. They only had it lowered to conserve the battery. If you look at PSP games like them or not when they take advantage of the hardware the PSP totally eats the DS for lunch when it comes to raw power.


Actually the GBA is more powerful

SNES is a 16bit system CPU: 16-bit 65816 (3.58MHz)
GBA is a 32 bit system CPU: 32bit RISC-CPU + 8bit CISC-CPU it was more powerful than the old SNES
here is a couple of links with more info
http://www.cyberiapc.com/vgg/nintendo_snes.htm
http://www.vgescape.com/features/55/gba-specs

I mean look at all the specs, the GBA has better specs all the way around. The SNES while had good specs for it's day still had an underpowered proc.
Logged

EmuChicken

  • PSPUAE Beta Tester
  • A500
  • *****
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 418
SNES vs. GBA
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2007, 05:37:48 AM »

ah yeah, underclocked that was it...

but also the snes (like the NES) had inbuilt chips into games...  remember the SuperFX chip? then the ones in the Megaman X games? - oh and then the ones in the Street Fighter alpha series?

saying things like "the gba kicks the arse off a snes" is pretty untrue imo though... its like saying the PC completely kills the Amiga in power comparison charts when in reality - it didnt....  (worms for example needed like a 66mhz cpu on the pc, and a 7mhz on the A500)...  comparing systems just off the cpu power ...  its kinda unfair you know.
- look at the resolution differences on the gba compared to the snes...  the screens so small on the gba that it doesnt even really need such a high res
gba : 240x160
snes : 512x448

I've got a feeling that the sound chip / outputs are much more clear on the the snes too

I think you'd have to agree that it doesnt matter how powerful the system is, just what games are actually created on them... and mostly original software beats hands down...  > as I said before the f-zeros etc...  I'd say even advance wars (if it ever had came out in europe) would be better on the snes... but as they included a story to the gba version- and it was the first to come out worldwide- it was an AMAZING release. - I even bought it! :>

would kinda say the same for final fantasy tactics too....  but imo it doesnt challenge the original psx version.....
that said we're going waaay off topic...  ermn, does a mod wanna change this somewhere appropriate?
Logged

Trekster

  • A600
  • *
  • Karma: -2
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 20
  • tis a far far better thing I do....
    • Digital Dreams Classic Gaming
SNES vs. GBA
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2007, 05:53:16 AM »

« Last Edit: September 20, 2007, 06:01:57 AM by Trekster »
Logged

EmuChicken

  • PSPUAE Beta Tester
  • A500
  • *****
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 418
SNES vs. GBA
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2007, 07:01:37 AM »

I dont quite understand your point really...  ... snes has more memory - and can do alreet 3d with the super fx chip... I've not seen any games come close to the PSX in 3D ability... or I've not seen any 3d on the GBA! :o

with the colours though- its like comparing Speedball 2 to Speedball 2 AGA...  most games dont even need that many colours onscreen at once... especially not any gba game on that small screen - saying that its more powerful is correct in someways, but its like heat...  so much wasted for no noticeable improvement.

AFAIK most, if not all snes games run in 512x resolution

If it wanted to be superior to the snes, the games needed to be BETTER than the snes - thats where it counts... and IMO it doesnt have a chance as most things on the snes were revolutionary... same thing went for the Amiga, and the Megadrive...  the only thing the gba did was get 2nd class snes games to fit into your pocket.
- ps: No other mario kart comes CLOSE to the SNES version! - word
Logged

Hungry Horace

  • Amorphous Blue-Blob Man
  • Site Admin
  • A4000T
  • ******
  • Karma: 307
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 3,364
  • Don't forget... Ameboid's need love too!
    • AUW
Re: SNES vs. GBA
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2007, 12:16:28 PM »

it's on-topic now, since i've split this away from the other thread.


feel free to bitch away about this fanboyish topic to your hearts content guys ;)
Logged
Quote from: KillerGorilla
because winuae is made of code and your amiga is made of stuff

EmuChicken

  • PSPUAE Beta Tester
  • A500
  • *****
  • Karma: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 418
Re: SNES vs. GBA
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2007, 02:09:11 PM »

lol- yey!  thanks bud ;)

I think for the record- the most "powerful" would be the gba (cpuwise etc) - but the most "complete" system has to be the snes ...  I think thats what I'm trying to put across.. ie the gba is just a copy that you can fit in yer back pocket
Logged

skateblind

  • Important 'looking' person
  • Forum Mod
  • A2000
  • *****
  • Karma: 668
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 509
Re: SNES vs. GBA
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2007, 05:31:45 PM »

^^ what he said.
Logged
What are you looking at?

Hungry Horace

  • Amorphous Blue-Blob Man
  • Site Admin
  • A4000T
  • ******
  • Karma: 307
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 3,364
  • Don't forget... Ameboid's need love too!
    • AUW
Re: SNES vs. GBA
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2007, 10:28:16 PM »

^^ what he said.

yah... lolz... ftw... and all that netspeak nonsense ;)

only teasing - best i stay away from such Nintendo discussion - ive made vocal my opinion on both these systems many times - there's no need to go down that road again ;)
Logged
Quote from: KillerGorilla
because winuae is made of code and your amiga is made of stuff

Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

TinyPortal 2.2.2 © 2005-2022